waste management and waste technology and waste procurement03 May 2008 10:51 pm

It is looking increasingly unlikely that the Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority will sign its £3billion waste treatment contract today, despite plans for a long-awaited financial close.

“The negotiations for the new contract are progressing in a positive manner towards a close and the start of the new contract”; said Pam Taylor, GMWDA.

On April 11, the Authority said that it was on course to sign the long-term deal with preferred bidders Viridor and Laing on April 29.

This followed months of the Authority pushing the signing back, from an original date of June 2007.

However, today, the Authority would not comment on when the contract would be signed and remained tight-lipped over its progress.

Echoing a statement from earlier this month, a spokeswoman merely said that the authority was making good “progress” in its negotiations.

Pam Taylor, communications support officer for the GMWDA, said: “The negotiations for the new contract are progressing in a positive manner towards a close and the start of the new contract. As soon as any further information and pictures are available, these will be sent out.”

The GMWDA contract is hugely dependent on sending refuse derived fuel to an energy from waste plant being proposed by chemicals firm Ineos Chlor, which is still awaiting planning permission.

The application is currently being decided by John Hutton MP, secretary of state for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, but is not thought that it will be decided imminently - which could have contributed to the delay.

The Treasury is also adjusting the rules by which authorities and contractors have to adhere to in order to issue a promissory note for £100 million of PFI funding, already approved by Defra.

Under Viridor and Laing’s proposals, around 600,000 tonnes of Greater Manchester’s waste which cannot be recycled will be taken to five new mechanical biological treatment and anaerobic digestion plants located in Salford, North & South Manchester, Oldham and Stockport.

See letsrecycle.com story.

Tags:

Uncategorized and waste technology and materials recycling facility and incineration03 May 2008 10:43 pm

May 2 — Wastequip, a Cleveland-based company that manufactures equipment and containers for use in the waste handling industry, has announced a restructuring plan that will close several older plants while implementing environmental initiatives.The company hopes the efforts will reduce costs, energy use and carbon dioxide emissions.

Wastequip operates 35 manufacturing facilities nationwide. The company has not announced how many plants might shut down as part of the restructuring. However, company spokesman Jerry Samson said fewer than 10 facilities will close.

“At this time, we´re still evaluating that,” Samson said. “All we really know is we´re going to have it complete by the end of the year. Right now, we don´t know the exact number of facilities because we´re still in that process, but we´ll probably have a pretty good idea of that in the next 45 to 60 days.”

Wastequip said it would offer the workers affected by the closings relocation opportunities or assistance in finding employment in their local communities.

The plants Wastequip closes will be among its older and least efficient facilities, according to the company. Efficiency improvements at newer plants have resulted in production capacity gains that eliminate the need for the less efficient plants, according to the company.

Wastequip also plans to benefit from green initiatives at its remaining plants that will include increased use of energy efficient lighting and heating, ventilation and air conditioning [HVAC] controls. The company´s Winamac, Ind., plant already has put those measures in place and received an environmental stewardship award from the Indiana governor´s office. More…

Tags:

Uncategorized and waste management and landfill and resource management and recycling and products from waste19 Apr 2008 12:42 am

Global Landfill Mining
Conference and Exhibition

London Wednesday 17 September 2008

‘Treasure from Trash’

Register your interest in attending now - click on the link below.
——————————————————————————–

From its origins in the 1950s, Landfill Mining is an idea whose time has come. Even aside from their valuable methane resources, landfills should now be seen as valuable repositories for a wealth of higher value materials. Landfill mining can recover valuable metals, produce high quality fertiliser and construction materials, and can make available real-estate that was once considered lost forever.

Attendence will allow landfill operators to extend their business models, and to extract the maximum value from their assets. Networking opportunities at the event will be superb, and the adjacent exhibition will allow operators to source the most cost-effective equipment and advice for landfill mining and monetisation.

——————————————————————————–

Crucial information

This conference and exhibition will give delegates the latest information on the following crucial areas:

• Legislative status of landfills and future legislative trends;

• Reclamation versus mining;

• What’s in our landfills (and how has it changes since burial)?;

• Methane evolution and monetisation;

• The mechanics of landfill mining: Recovery, separation and beneficiation

• Product-stream utilisation and monetisation

• Post-mining site remediation and value optimisation
——————————————————————————–

Who will attend?

Local authorities • Landfill operators • Legislators • Stakeholders • Equipment providers • Academics • Hydrologists •

Resource users including Cement producers • Lime producers • Power producers • Metals producers • Chemicals producers •

——————————————————————————–

Visit the GLM Conference web site, click here.

Waster: The word is that if you are quick there may still be time to put in abstracts for good relevant papers.

Tags:

landfill and resource management and waste reduction08 Apr 2008 12:29 am

The Environment Agency has released Waste Data Update from 2006. The Waste Data Update shows nearly 20 percent less waste has been sent to landfill since 2000. Waste Data Update 2006 is an annual report produced using data routinely collect by the Environment Agency from waste management sites it regulates. 

For the press release see http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/news/1999144

For the report see http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/subjects/waste/1031954/315439/1933625/?lang=_e 

The Waster is not happy: He was born to landfill, or so they say! (But, the Environment Agency must be much relieved!)

Tags:

waste management and landfill29 Mar 2008 07:50 pm

US company Waste Management Inc. has sued SAP Americas Inc. and its German parent, SAP AG, alleging that they fraudulently induced it to purchase software for running its business that was “undeveloped, untested and defective.”

Houston-based Waste Management says in the lawsuit, which was filed last Thursday in district court in Harris County, Texas, that it invested more than $100 million in buying and installing the software.

Waste Management (NYSE:WMI) is asking for actual and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, other costs of the lawsuit and pre-and post-judgment interest.

An SAP (NYSE:SAP) spokesman said SAP doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation. SAP Americas is based in Newtown Square, Pa.

In the suit, Waste Management alleges that in late 2004 or early 2005, SAP learned it was looking for software to replace the software it was using to run its business.

SAP, the suit says, knew that Waste Management wanted software that didn’t have to be heavily customized and could be installed rapidly.

According to the suit, SAP represented to Waste Management that it had such software, when what it actually had was “software still in development and utterly incapable of running the operations of an American waste and recycling company.”  More here…

Wasters Comment: This is a serious matter, but not uncommon in the UK that software systems fail to achieve their intended purpose. Does anyone remember that all patient National Health Service records were due to be available to all in the UK via a National Health Service web site? Well it never happened did it? Maybe it is time that someone in the UK took the software suppliers to court?

Tags:

waste management and recycling and swmps and site waste management plans14 Mar 2008 11:22 pm

“WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme) has launched (on 26 February 2008) a Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) template to help the construction industry comply with legislation coming into force in England in April, which will make SWMPs a mandatory requirement on all aspects of construction work worth more than £300,000.

The template, which supports standard, good and best practice in general construction, housing and civil engineering projects, has been developed with Halcrow, Costain, C4S, the NHBC Foundation and the BRE to support the industry in developing their plans. The template comprises a series of 14 steps, which follow the construction lifecycle from pre-design to project completion and review.  Using the template will enable contractors to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) for waste and materials, and monitor performance throughout the project. Importantly, the template can be used to demonstrate good and best practice performance beyond simple standard compliance with the regulations.

Mervyn Jones, WRAP Programme Manager for Waste Minimisation and Management, comments: “Now that SWMPs are to become mandatory we wanted to provide an approach that would not just help the sector and its clients comply with the legislation, but also offer the opportunity to identify and deliver good and best practice in reducing waste and using materials more efficiently. The template will lead construction professionals through both the development and implementation of the plan, at each stage of construction.”

The template can be implemented from the conception of a project and offers the flexibility for use either in its entirety or for relevant elements to be incorporated into existing templates or systems that a company may have in place.  It will allow contractors to predict and monitor the waste produced by a project, detail decisions taken to minimise waste generated, and at completion produce final reports to demonstrate overall performance.

The template includes guidance at each step to enable professionals to understand the data they need to input and how it can be used to inform the rest of the plan.  The template is part of a suite of WRAP resources to support SWMPs. More…

The Waster says: These templates look awe inspiringly complicated! A £300,000 project is not large, and yet these templates are intended from that size project and upward. It will amaze me if these templates get used.

There is surely a need for a more down to earth approach toward compliance than these templates. We need tools designed for the average contractor with uncomplicated waste disposal needs for the vast majority of simple projects.

These templates smack at a project completed by a Spreadsheet Wiz, but very few in the industry will be on this wavelength at all - in my view. I hope the industry proves me wrong, because the aims of reducing waste and saving money are worthwhile.

Not sure what a Site Waste Management Plan is? For a summary of the requirements and an explanatory video visit our SWMP hubpage here.

Tags:

waste management and landfill13 Mar 2008 11:22 pm

A Yeadon skip firm fined for using illegal tip

A Yeadon company has been fined £15,000 for dumping waste on an illegal landfill site.

Bill Dyson Skip Hire and Waste Management Ltd, of Sandy Way, was also ordered to pay £1,750 in costs after being found guilty at Leeds Magistrates Court.

The Yeadon company was one of five defendants charged with offences involving the illegal landfill site which was owned by a farmer.

A total of £49,000 of fines was imposed by the court, plus costs which were payable to the Environment Agency which brought the case. All the defendants pleaded guilty.

The court heard that James Crabtree was the owner of Syke House Farm, in Barwick-in-Elmet, and had been frequently warned about allowing commercial waste to be dumped on his land in what was effectively a landfill.

Despite this he invited individuals and businesses to dispose of waste and was seen to manage the landfill by moving waste around, levelling it off and adding waste to burning fires.

The site had no waste management licence and was effectively an illegal landfill.

Mr Crabtree charged for loads dumped at the site, and because he had not paid for a waste management licence he was competing unfairly with legal landfill businesses.

The other four defendants were the individuals and businesses that were caught using the illegal landfill site.

Steve Williamson of the Environment Agency said: “This case was a flagrant breach of the law, and despite being warned on several occasions that he was in breach of the waste management legislation Mr Crabtree continued to operate this illegal landfill.

“Not only was the site unlicensed and without any features that would protect the environment, but on scientifically assessing the site location we discovered that it was in a particularly vulnerable area.

“The landfill was built on a natural source of water, and the wastes dumped there could have released a cocktail of chemicals into the environment as they broke down.

“We will not hesitate to take the appropriate actions against those who flout the waste legislation, especially those who do it with such a total disregard for the environment.”

James Norman Crabtree of Syke House Farm, Potterton Lane, Barwick-in-Elmet, Leeds was fined £15,000 and ordered to pay costs of £3,000. More…

Tags:

waste management and resource management and recycling and waste reduction10 Mar 2008 09:57 pm

Are any of our subscribers UK construction contractors?

If so, are you ready for the new requirement for compulsory Site Waste Management Plans (SWMPs)?

The Waster has been trying to get his head around the new requirements and has posted a video to the Landfill-Site Web Site for general use. OK, all this infomation is available on official web sites, so this is nothing new, but if you like you information presented in a video, rather than to read it cold from a web page, then you may want to watch this.

Is this style of video useful? Is the Waster’s presentation crap?! The Waster would like to know!! (Comment on YouTube by clicking through to YouTube.com, or comment here on the blog. Be gentle!)

View the video at SWMPS at The Landfill Site here, or at my Hubpages SWMPS hub.

Tags:

resource management and waste collection10 Mar 2008 09:39 pm

Veolia reports growth in “unfavourable” economy

The French utilities company which owns Veolia Environmental Services UK has posted strong financial results for 2007 - despite “unfavourable” market conditions.

Veolia Environnement has reported that in the year up until December 31 2007, its global revenue increased by 14% - from the equivalent of £21.7 billion in 2006 to £24.7 billion in 2007.

In the same period, the company’s net income grew 22.3% - from the equivalent of £584 million in 2006 to £705.9million million Euros in 2007.

In the company’s waste division - which is the second waste management player in the world- operating income meanwhile increased by 23.9% to the equivalent of £610.9 million in 2007.

Veolia Environnement put the growth down to “strategic choices” by the company and by its focus on long-term contacts within a wide geographical area.

In the UK, the company paid particular credit to the performance of its integrated waste management contracts and to winning a long-term PFI contract with Shropshire (see letsrecycle.com story).

It also recognised the successful consolidation of Cleanaway into Veolia, after the company was taken over in 2006 (see letsrecycle.com story) and to the acquisition of German waste giant Sulo.

More…

Tags:

waste management and landfill and landfill gas and energy from waste and biowaste treatment24 Feb 2008 09:56 pm

Wisconsin State Journal - Landfill will get longer life; bioreactor planned - by Ron Seely

With space left for just six years worth of garbage in the Dane County Landfill, officials are on the verge of re-engineering the 76-acre site to install a controversial system that will hasten the decomposition of waste and extend the operation of the facility by as much as 10 to 15 years.

But critics say the plan poses long-term threats to air and groundwater. And they worry that continuing to rely on the landfill has short-circuited a thorough discussion of how the region’s waste will be disposed of in the future. They say the county is missing an opportunity to move toward a future without landfills and to rely more heavily on recycling, including recycling of organic wastes such as food.

Dane County is not alone in its struggles with waste. Bill Casey, solid waste director for Columbia County and a board member of the Wisconsin Counties Solid Waste Management Association, said there are only 50 landfills, both private and municipal, operating in the state. Many of them are fast filling up, Casey said, so communities throughout the state are in the midst of discussions about where to put their garbage.

“We’re seeing this all over the state”, Casey said. “It’s a problem. It’s going to continue to be a problem. Every time we close a landfill, that waste has to go someplace else. These are going to be difficult decisions.”

Bioreactor planned

Meanwhile, county engineers are preparing to build a $2-million bioreactor at the Dane County Landfill, just east of Interstate 39-90 on Highway 12-18.

“Bioreactor ‘ ‘ is a fancy name for a system of pumps and pipes that will circulate water and air through the landfilled garbage and cause it to decompose more quickly, thus freeing up space for more waste, said Gerald Mandli, public works director for Dane County.

The new system, which may be in operation by next fall, basically turns the landfill into “a cooking vessel, ‘ ‘ Mandli said.

Use of the bioreactor turns the current science behind the landfill ’s operation on its head. Since it went into operation in 1986, the object has been to keep moisture away from the garbage. In fact, the common name for the system in use at the Dane County landfill and most landfills across the country is “dry tombing. ‘ ‘

Currently, about 20,000 gallons a day of leachate — Mandli calls it “garbage juice ‘ ‘ — from decomposing garbage is pumped out of the landfill and piped to the Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District plant where it is treated and discharged along with other processed wastes.

To make the bioreactor work, that leachate would be recirculated through the landfill, along with air. The air and water both hasten decomposition.

Mandli said the bioreactor was approved by the County Board last year after it became apparent that the landfill was filling up faster than anticipated.

Tons of unexpected waste jammed the landfill in 2006 and 2007, from the homes destroyed and damaged by the Stoughton-area tornado in August 2005 and from the roofing materials replaced after a hailstorm in April 2006. The landfill took in 53,000 tons of shingles in the wake of hailstorms, Mandli said.

The bioreactor is still in the design stage. Mandli said the county is taking its time with the project so that all potential problems are addressed.

More methane

Chief among those problems, according to Peter Anderson, owner of Recycleworlds Consulting in Madison and a nationally-known expert on recycling and waste disposal, is the increased production of methane, a gas produced by the decomposing garbage.

Currently, methane gas is drawn by a vacuum system from the landfill and used to power generators that turn it into electricity. That electricity, enough to power 5,000 homes, is sold to Madison Gas & Electric for $1.2 million a year. More…

(Waster: This sounds rather like what we term in Europe a “Flushing” landfill. This treatment of a landfill is not permissible within the EU Landfill Directive. Also, the removal of high Landfill Gas yield is usually impeded by the greater extent of perched water tables and flooded gas extraction wells such that increased gas yields would not necessarily result from this treatment at all.)

Tags:

Next Page »